Thursday, January 31, 2008
City Square
He begins by describing the different parts, of the music in a very concrete manner, "The piano and rhythm guitar lay down they're thick jazzy chords,"(174). There are several experiences of the music cannot be describing in the way above, so Henry must use more abtract terms, " He lets it engluf him. There are these rare moments when musicians together touch something sweeter than theyve ever found before ... when their expression becomes as easy and graceful as friendship or love"(176).
It seems that in the description of music like this, it is unable to be portrayed effectively without the use of a certain amount of abstract language. The problem with this type of language is that it can be interpreted differently by each reader, or maybe that is its strength? Although the portrayal of music through words can never transfer the entire experience to the reader. This may be as close as one can get.
The Individual
The epigraph, a passage from Saul Bellow’s novel Herzog, refers to “the multiplied power of numbers which made the self negligible.” The individual becomes a mere number in the context of statistics, a blurry face in the context of a crowd. The novel highlighted the importance of remembering the individual, especially in this age of technology and globalization and conflict.
Henry’s profession, while noble and respected, is not very conducive to the perception of people as individuals. Baxter, for instance, while having a large impact on Henry’s life, becomes, in Henry’s eyes, merely a patient, a medical case. In the end, however, Henry is forced to see Baxter as a real person. He visits his bedside after the surgery, realizes that sleep and death are Baxter’s only reprieves and makes the decision to not press charges. Baxter’s life will be hard enough as it is. While one cannot totally excuse him from his actions, so much of his situation can be attributed to chance. The impartiality of genetics gave him the disease that will disintegrate his body and mind. We’ll never be able to tell who Baxter might have become had his genes not displayed 40 copies of a certain DNA sequence, or had his relationship with his father been different.
Art serves as a contrast to Henry’s scientific approach in that it highlights the uniqueness of the individual. Ten doctors will treat a heart attack in pretty much the same way, with the same results, but ten artists asked to portray a certain object will give ten vastly different depictions. In fact, it is art that saves Henry… not Henry’s calculations, or his medical knowledge. It’s Daisy who recites “
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
A struggle to the death
Henry takes an interest in Baxter not because he feels sympathetic towards Baxter’s situation or because he likes him as an individual but rather because Baxter is a fascinating, difficult case. Henry desires to add Baxter to his collection of medical conquests, viewing him as something and not someone. When Henry completes Baxter’s surgery, he records Baxter’s information in his notebook adding Baxter to his collection of patients and confirming his victory in their mutual struggle for control that began in the streets of London.
After Baxter’ surgery, Henry is restored to his high pedestal where he returns to observing the world through microscopes and scalpels. He no longer feels helpless because the surgery reminded him that he can “exercise authority and shape events” (288). In the outside world, Baxter may have appeared threatening. However, submerged in a medical universe where Henry is “king, he’s vast, accommodating, immune,” Baxter was merely a lost, confused soul who Henry saved in order to reaffirm his power in the one place he can still move mountains.
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
From Large Scale to Small Scale
This all changes though when his encounter with Baxter inherits a visit to Henry's home during a dinner with his family. Baxter's break-in gives Henry a revised outlook on himself and his existence. His courage with Theo to repel Baxter is Henry's first step in his growth, which this book shows, is never over.
Henry, who even when discussing the war with his daughter seems to not even really comprehend that 9/11 and Iraq are serious matters, now has a new understanding on society and life. Perhaps the most moving part of the novel is when he starts to think about his family and realizes that something could happen to them at any time. He thinks of Rosalind's baby that is on the way and the future with a grand child in the picture. This entire scenario pushes Henry past his surgeries and squash matches to a better understanding of the world around him. It is amazing how one event can really make one realize just how important everyone and everything is around him, and that it is the same with those in Iraq.
a day off?
Upon waking up in the wee hours of his Saturday morning, Henry immediately wonders what “chemical accident” could have occurred in his brain causing him to wake (4). Looking from his window at the square below, Henry analyzes the people passing through it, even going so far as to diagnose one girl as a heroin addict after he sees her continually scratching her back, presumably a result of “amphetamine driven formication” (58). During his first encounter with Baxter, he notes the man’s “poor self-control, emotional lability, [and] explosive temper” as early signs of Huntington’s disease, an observation that would have evaded the attention of the average person.
Neurosurgery offers Henry a sense of control that he wishes to extend into other areas of his life. At work, Henry feels at ease because he knows “precisely what he’s doing,” but outside of the hospital, Henry loses this feeling of power and security. Thus, we see Henry constantly analyzing every situation in terms of neurology, perhaps in order to make him feel as though he still has everything under control as he does in the operating room. When Henry finally finds himself back in the hospital despite his scheduled day off, he discovers "he's happier than at any other point on his day off" (266).
Sunday, January 27, 2008
"An orthodoxy of attention"
Henry dismisses his daughter’s ways of thinking as “the recourse of an insufficient imagination, a dereliction of duty, a childish evasion of the difficulties and wonders of the real” (66). However, as displayed by the argument he has with Daisy over the
"Everything belongs in the present"
During his visit with his aging mother, Henry’s day is quickly thrown into sharp relief by the relative motionless and stagnate day experienced by Lillian Perowne. His mother’s dementia alters not only her state of mind but her relationship with time, as well. Unlike his mother, Henry constantly deliberates over his past actions and experiences. Whether reflecting on his initial meeting with Rosalind or a family rift between Grammaticus and Daisy, Henry’s thoughts continually wander to the past in order to make a connection with his present.
Lillian’s inability to remember her past life strips her of anything else but the present moment. McEwan presents her as a figure divided into two selfs: the former woman of the past who swam extraordinarily well and raised a son and the old woman sitting at the elderly community like a blank page, desperately waiting for someone to fill in the lines of her life. She remains a nonentity without any memories of her former self and a future offering nothing but a handful of empty moments.
Imprisoned in the present, Lillian offers an understanding to the reader that even though the novel transpires along the course of one Saturday, Henry’s “day” transcends the framework of a limited 24 hours and spills over into his past as well as his ponderings of the future.